I Drive A Lot. And A Review of Fuelly.
I took my beloved Zaphod Beeblebrox the Car in for its 45,000 km service appointment this week, so I figured it was as good a time as any to write an update about my beloved car. Also, it gives me a chance to tell all y’all about the new fun website I’ve been using to track my gas usage (spoiler: it makes graphs!)
Ever since I got my car, I’ve been tracking my mileage. To do this, I’ve been using a handy dandy spreadsheet ((Spreadsheets. Is there anything they can’t do?)). And because of this, I can easily tell you that in the 2 years and 2 months that I’ve owned my car, I have:
- driven 45,609 km ((For my American readers, that’s 28,340 miles)) – that’s an average of 57 km per day!
- used 2,839L of gas
- spent $3,656 in gas and about $1,300 in other car maintenance-related expenses ((e.g., regular service appointments, deductible for replacement windshield, replacement of flat tire.))
But I was recently introduced to Fuelly ((As per usu, I have no affiliation with Fuelly other than that I use their free service)), a website that tracks your mileage for you… and gives you pretty graphs and infographics! Being a graph-loving nerd, I naturally had to try it out. Fortunately, Fuelly lets you import data so I could just import the data I’d been tracking on my handy dandy spreadsheet and viola – graphs!
Aren’t they pretty?
If you are interested in my ongoing tracking of Zaphod’s mileage – and who wouldn’t be, really? – you can “follow” me on Fuelly.
Comments |8|
Tags: car, Fuelly, gas, mileage, review, review of Fuelly, Smart Car, vehicle, Zaphod Beeblebrox the Car
That is so nerdy I can’t help but be entertained and fully supportive.
My friend Steven was *just* telling me on The Twitter that the Fiat 500 (a new adorable car that I’m in love with) has a USB port where you can plug in a USB stick and download all your mileage/performance data from your car. WANT!!!!
The MPG seems low… all that
citySurrey driving, I guess?The MPG is low because it’s a Smart car!
But MPG should be HIGH if it’s fuel efficient (the opposite of 100km/L)… I was saying it doesn’t seem to be as efficient as it should be.
Oops, I meant it’s high because it’s a Smart car. Why do you think 37.5 is low? That’s pretty close to what a 2009 Smart car is expected to be (http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/advancedSearch.htm)
I just had it in my mind (and think I did a quick search, although it might have shown me the 2012 figures) that the MPG was significantly higher for a Smart, like 40+.
Yeah, that’s probably for the latest models.